{"id":4486,"date":"2024-04-25T19:50:21","date_gmt":"2024-04-25T10:50:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/c-mng.cwh.hokudai.ac.jp\/www.juris\/riilp\/?p=4486"},"modified":"2024-04-25T19:50:21","modified_gmt":"2024-04-25T10:50:21","slug":"ws2024-04-22","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/c-mng.cwh.hokudai.ac.jp\/www.juris\/riilp\/event\/ws2024-04-22.html","title":{"rendered":"\u77e5\u7684\u8ca1\u7523\u6cd5\u7814\u7a76\u4f1a\uff082024\/04\/22\uff09"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n
\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
\u3000\u3000\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u8a18

\u25cf\u65e5\u6642\uff1a2024\u5e744\u670822(\u6708)\u300015\uff1a00\uff08JST\uff09\uff5e\u3000Zoom\u306b\u3066\u5b9f\u65bd

\u25cf\u5831\u544a\u8005\uff1aDr Luminita Olteanu, Assistant Professor, Warwick Law School, UK.

\u25cf\u30c6\u30fc\u30de\uff1a\"Evolving Copyright Originality in the UK and Japan: Historical Underpinnings and Technology-Aided Creations\"

\u25cf\u53c2\u8003\u6587\u732e\uff1a
- Bernard Edelman, Ownership of the Image: Elements for a Marxist Theory of Law (Routledge & Kegan Paul 1979)
- Estelle Derclaye (ed), Research Handbook on the Future of EU Copyright (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009)
- Jane Gaines, Contested Culture: The Image, The Voice and the Law (1992)
- Rosalind Kraus - The Originality of the Avant Garde (1985)
- Dennis S. Karjala & Keiji Sugiyama, \"Fundamental Concepts in Japanese and American Copyright Law\" The American Journal of Comparative Law, Volume 36, Issue 4, Autumn 1988, Pages 613-679
Cases\uff1a
- Ladbroke v William Hill [1964] 1 All ER 465
- Sawkins v Hyperion Records [2005] EWCA Civ 565
- Case C-5\/08 Infopaq International v. Danske Dagblades Forening [2009] ECR I-6569
- Case C-145\/10 Eva-Maria Painer v. Standard VerlagsGmbH [2012] ECDR (6) 89
- Bill of Lading Form, 1 Chosakuken Hanreishu 3 (Aug. 31, 1965, Tokyo District Court) 12-15
- Court Diary, II-1 Chosakuken Hanreishu 106 (Nov. 20, 1937, Great Court of Judicature)<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<\/figure>\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u3000\u3000\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u8a18 \u25cf\u65e5\u6642\uff1a2024\u5e744\u670822(\u6708)\u300015\uff1a00\uff08JST\uff09\uff5e\u3000Zoom\u306b\u3066\u5b9f\u65bd \u25cf\u5831\u544a\u8005\uff1aDr Luminita Olt […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/c-mng.cwh.hokudai.ac.jp\/www.juris\/riilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4486"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/c-mng.cwh.hokudai.ac.jp\/www.juris\/riilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/c-mng.cwh.hokudai.ac.jp\/www.juris\/riilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/c-mng.cwh.hokudai.ac.jp\/www.juris\/riilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/c-mng.cwh.hokudai.ac.jp\/www.juris\/riilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4486"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/c-mng.cwh.hokudai.ac.jp\/www.juris\/riilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4486\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4488,"href":"https:\/\/c-mng.cwh.hokudai.ac.jp\/www.juris\/riilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4486\/revisions\/4488"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/c-mng.cwh.hokudai.ac.jp\/www.juris\/riilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4486"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/c-mng.cwh.hokudai.ac.jp\/www.juris\/riilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4486"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/c-mng.cwh.hokudai.ac.jp\/www.juris\/riilp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4486"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}